🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.